Archives

If you see the L-word being used

If you come across the use of the word ‘leper’ or other negative language in media articles or social media posts, you may want to respond respectfully by suggesting alternative language.

If you see the ‘L’ word in a media story, you might wish to use or adapt this style of response:

Thank you for article X. We respectfully request that you change the word “leper” to “people affected by leprosy”, as this is the accepted term used currently that promotes the dignity and human rights of people who have experienced this disease. The former term is considered derogatory, and using it perpetuates the stigma and discrimination many people affected by leprosy experience.

In some instances, you may want to share content that contains language or images that do not adhere to the ILEP policy but has other value. A suggested longer disclaimer, for social media, websites, etc:

Please note that while we are sharing this relevant/important/interesting article, ILEP and its Members object to the use of the word ‘leper’ because it is derogatory and dehumanising to women, men and children affected by leprosy, and their families. We instead endorse the use of language and imagery that respects and promotes the dignity of all persons affected by leprosy. We routinely reach out to journalists and media outlets about the importance of using appropriate language and the positive role they can play in helping end stigma and discrimination. See our ILEP policy on language, photography and imagery for more information.

A shorter disclaimer on Twitter might read:

While we object to the use of the L word, which is derogatory towards people affected by leprosy, this is otherwise an important article to share.

Good Practice

Good practice / DescriptionCountryTopic/Keyword

The National Leprosy and Tuberculosis Control programme, a unit of the Federal Ministry of Health, used the UN Principles and Guidelines as one of its background documents in drafting its current strategic plan thus ensuring that adequate safeguards are provided for persons affected by leprosy and their family members against discrimination.

NigeriaAnti-discrimination in future legislation

The National Commission for Human Rights participated in the review of laws tabled in the Parliament to ensure that no law is passed that violates the human rights of citizens, including persons affected by leprosy and their family members.

RwandaAnti-discrimination in future legislation

People affected by leprosy join associations to defend their rights as people with disabilities and get involved in inclusion processes.

ColombiaAssociations of affected by leprosy

The National Action plan developed by the Ministry of Health for the years 2014 – 2016 has activities targeting the awareness raising on issues of discrimination as well as workshops on stigma for community members and health workers.

Sri LankaAwareness

Several services are provided by various Ministries, such as annual conferences, symposia, annual awareness raising activities, counselling services and investigations of suspected human rights violations.

JapanAwareness, counselling, prevention

People affected by leprosy are empowered by DAHW to start their social inclusion process and eliminate stigmatisation.

ColombiaCBR implementation

Leprosy Compensation Law: Law to compensate interned persons in the leprosia, 2001.

JapanCompensation (2001)

Law 11.520 provides financial support and compensation for persons affected by leprosy in leprosy colonies (2007). This includes lifetime public pension and access to quality leprosy services at all levels.

BrazilCompensation (2007)

Economic support for those affected by leprosy with disabilities is increased to a legal minimum wage.

ColombiaEconomic support Law 380 of 1997

State laws (Constitution laws) Act 12, states that all people are equal no matter someone’s condition.

TanzaniaEquality

The Annual Report of the Government’s Anti Leprosy Campaign for 2014 mentions – ‘To fight all forms of stigma associated with Leprosy’ as one of their specific objectives.

Sri LankaFighting stigma as objective

The vision of the ‘National leprosy strategic plan 2015-2020’ is ‘No disability, no discrimination, self-reliance’. One of the strategies is to promote the public awareness about leprosy, and stigma and discrimination against persons affected by leprosy and their family members.

ThailandFighting stigma as objective

Financial assistance is provided for people affected by leprosy who do not own any assets.

ColombiaFinancial assistance Law 14 of 1964.

Persons with Disability Act No 9 / 2010, make provisions for the health care, social support, accessibility, rehabilitation, education and vocational training, communication, employment or work protection and promotion of basic rights for the persons with disabilities and to provide for related matters

TanzaniaInclusion of persons with disabilities.

National Strategy on Inclusive Education. 2009 – 2017 reinforced and consolidated so as to provide access to quality education to all children with an emphasis on children with disabilities.

TanzaniaInclusive Education

In 2011, the national leprosy control programme decided to include people affected by leprosy in Inclusive Self Care Groups for prevention and care of disabilities.

MozambiqueInclusive Self Care Groups (2011)

Government passed a law “Decreto do Deficiente Fisico” and is passing a law for protection of people with disability and stopping stigma and discrimination.

AngolaLaw for protection of people with disabilities

The government has issued guidelines on implementation of National Leprosy Control Program to ensure persons affected by leprosy enjoy equal rights with others regarding e.g. the right to work and education, establishing a family and public transport. However, it is reported that government officers and organizations do not practise the policies and legal document in reality.

VietnamLegal documents promoting inclusion

The Act includes a provision of free legal aid to persons with disabilities, so any leprosy cured person who fits within the mandate of the disability law would fall within this positive provision

IndiaLegal Services Act, 1987

Partners in Nepal succesfully lobbied against the discriminatory “Anti-Marriage Law” that would have allowed the spouse of a person affected by leprosy to claim for a divorce (on basis of leprosy).

NepalLobby against discriminatory law

National disability mainstreaming strategy 2010-2015 (NDMS), Oct 2010

TanzaniaMainstreaming disability issues (including persons with leprosy related disabilities) in existing structure

Patient associations organise the National Federation of People Affected by Leprosy seeking representation at the national level.

ColombiaPeople affected by leprosy have national representation

Law of the Child Act no 21/2009 promotes protect and maintain the welfare of a child (including children with disabilities) with a view to giving effect to international and regional conventions on the rights of the child; to provide for affiliation, foster care, adoption and custody of the child; to further regulate employment and apprenticeship; to make provisions with respect to a child in conflict with law and to provide for related matters.

TanzaniaPromotes protection of all children, including those with disabilities

Eliminate racism and all forms of discrimination and consolidate public policies for the protection and prevention of racism and all forms of discrimination. Includes those affected by leprosy and other diseases.

BoliviaPublic policies to protect all discrimination forms. Law 045 of 2010

A Law Commission report in 2015 proposed composite legislation entitled “Eliminating Discrimination Against Persons Affected by Leprosy” (EDPAL) to eliminate discriminatory laws and implement anti-stigma provisions. Although some laws were repealed or amended, more than 100 remain on the statute books. The report is under review by the government.

IndiaRepeal of anti-discriminatory laws. Please note: this has been proposed but not yet active

Re-enactment of legislation, in line with Bangladesh’s CRPD obligations, to ensure establishment and protection of the rights of persons with disabilities. It also provides for the establishment of national and local committees to formulate and implement policies and guidelines to ensure the rights, dignity and welfare of persons with disabilities. In addition to general prohibition of discrimination there are specific provisions about access to identity cards, public transport, education and public services.

BangladeshRights and Protection of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2013

New law ‘Nº 01/2007 DU 20/01/2007’ to provide social protection to all disabled people (including leprosy-affected).

RwandaSocial protection

National strategy for Growth and Poverty reduction (II (2010) – advocates for interventions to prevent unacceptable levels of socioeconomic insecurity and deprivation, underscoring the fact that the developmental role that social protection can play is to grapple with poverty traps, reduce household insecurity and encourage investments in poverty -reducing assets (physical, human, social and financial).

TanzaniaSocial Protection for persons with disabilities

Introduced by a Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha (Upper House) in 2017. It is now to be listed for discussion for consideration to be made into a law in the Parliament. It is on the lines of the EDPAL report (No. 256) looking into the discriminatory provisions in various laws and the affirmative actions needed for people affected by leprosy for their integration, inclusion and participation.

IndiaThe Rights Of Persons Affected By Leprosy and Members Of Their Family (Protection Against Discrimination And Guarantee Of Social Welfare) Bill, 2017

Legislation in line with India’s CRPD obligations to ensure that persons with disabilities enjoy the right to equality, life with dignity and respect for his or her integrity equally with others. Classifications include ‘leprosy cured’, persons who have completed leprosy treatment but have loss of sensation or physical disability resulting from leprosy.

IndiaThe Rights of Persons with Disibalities Act, 2016

MORHAN, an organisation of persons affected by Hansen’s Disease (leprosy), often has a seat at the National Health Council and also participates actively in the national/state/municipal health conferences.

BrazilViews taken into account in decision making

The Act on the Promotion of Resolution of Hansen’s Disease Issues 2009, provides that governments shall take all necessary measures to reflect the opinions of persons affected by leprosy and other relevant persons in the formulation and implementation of measures concerning people affected by leprosy. This covers women, children, older persons and other vulnerable groups.

JapanViews taken into account in decision making

Discriminatory laws and regulations

LawCountryTopic/KeywordDescription
Alagappa University Act, 19851IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Alien Occupation Act, B.E. 2551 (2008)ThailandEmployment

Excludes people diagnosed with leprosy from obtaining work permits. If an applicant is diagnosed with leprosy with no severe active/complications, a work permit will be granted along with treatment. If severe active/complications are found, work permit is denied and treatment is provided before deportation.

Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952IndiaEmployment

A person suffering from leprosy is disqualified from enrolment as a pleader or mukhtar. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institution and Endowments Act, 1987IndiaSegregation/separation

Disqualification from membership or continuation on the Trust for persons suffering from leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Andhra Pradesh Co-Operative Societies Act, 1964IndiaEmployment

Disqualified from being or continuing as a member of the committee if suffering from leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in SC of India

Andhra Pradesh Excise (Grant of Licence of Selling by In-House and Conditions of Licence) Rules, 2005IndiaEmployment

Bar on persons suffering from leprosy to acquire a license if they are to personally handle the stocks. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Andhra Pradesh Excise (Lease of Right to Sell Liquor in Retail) Rules, 1969IndiaEmployment

Prohibition on persons suffering from leprosy to enter auction houses leading to segregation and disqualification from getting a lease to a person suffering from leprosy especially where the person is directly handling liquor. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968IndiaEmployment

Prohibition on employment of persons suffering from leprosy with the prescription of a punishment for contravention. Active act, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Andhra Pradesh Habitual Offenders Rules, 1965IndiaSegregation/separation

Provides for sending a prisoners suffering from leprosy to a leprosy asylum. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor & Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970IndiaEmployment

Bar on persons suffering from leprosy to acquire a license if they are to personally handle the stocks and for employment in this business. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Andhra Pradesh Medical Practitioners Registration Act, 1968IndiaEmployment

Disqualification from being a member of the council if affected by leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965IndiaSegregation/separation

Not eligible to stand for election or continue on a post in the municipality if suffering from leprosy and also to expel persons affected from market places leading to segregation and denial of political participation. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Begging Act, 1977IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of people affected by leprosy from beggary homes to leprosy asylums. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Andhra Pradesh Public Libraries Act, 1969IndiaEmployment

Disqualified from being a member of the Zilla Grandhalaya Samstha if suffering from leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Andhra Pradesh Universities Act, 1991IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University and also removal from a position of authority. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Assam Prevention of Begging Act, 1964IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of people affected by leprosy from beggary homes to leprosy asylums. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Banaras Hindu University Act, 1915IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from contagious leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University and also removal from a position of authority for non-teaching staff. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Bangalore Metro Railway (Carriage and Ticket) Rules, 2011IndiaPublic transportation

Restriction on travel of persons with leprosy. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Bengal Vagrancy Act, 1943IndiaSegregation/separation

Separation of people affected by leprosy from other vagrants in the home. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Bharathiar University Act, 1981IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Bharathidasan University Act, 1981IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University and also removal from a position of authority. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Bihar Document Writers Licensing Rules, 1968IndiaEmployment

Disqualification from grant of license if affected by leprosy. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Bihar Prevention Of Beggary Act, 1951IndiaSegregation/separation

Maybe segregated on the grounds infectious and contagious diseases, which ordinarily includes leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Bye-Laws of Pradeshik Co- Operative Dairy Federation Limited, 1979IndiaEmployment

Disqualification for being or continuing as a member of the Board of Directors if suffering from leprosy. Active bye-law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Cabinet decision no. 28 of 2010United Arab EmiratesImmigration related laws

People affected by leprosy are not allowed to enter the country and any person diagnosed with leprosy is deported.

Chennai Metro Railway (Carriage and Ticket) Rules, 2014IndiaPublic transportation

Restriction on travel of persons with leprosy. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Chhattisgarh Municipalities Act, 1961IndiaVoting related

Not eligible to stand for election if suffering from an infectious form of leprosy leading to segregation and denial of political participation. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

CitizenshipUSAImmigration related laws

People affected by leprosy are inadmissible

City of Rangoon Municipal Act, 1922MyanmarSegregation/separation

Municipal Corporation is allowed to establish segregated ‘asylums’ for persons affected by leprosy to whom ‘pauper lepers’ can be sent.

Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act, 1981IndiaSegregation/separation

Duty to expel persons suffering from leprosy from market areas leading to segregation. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Commercial Bathhouses Regulation (Cap. 132I)Hong KongSegregation/separation

Persons affected by communicable diseases, including leprosy, are denied access to commercial bathhouses.

Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954IndiaVoting related

Not eligible to stand for election or continue in office if suffering from leprosy leading to segregation and denial of political participation. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957IndiaSegregation/separation

Duty to expel persons suffering from leprosy from market areas leading to segregation. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Delhi Panchayat Raj Act, 1954IndiaVoting related

Not eligible to stand for election or continue in office if suffering from leprosy leading to segregation and denial of political participation. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Delhi Petty Offences (Trial by Special Metropolitan Magistrates) Rules, 1998IndiaEmployment

A person suffering from leprosy is disqualified from continuing in the post. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Delhi Prisons (Treatment of Convicts Sentenced to Simple Imprisonment, Death, Female Prisoners, Youthful Prisoners, Leper Prisoners and Lunatic Prisoners) Rules, 1988IndiaSegregation/separation

Provides for the segregation and separation of prisoners affected by leprosy and destruction of clothing and bedding used by such prisoner. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939PakistanMarriage/Divorce

Women are entitled to divorce their husbands if “he has been insane for a period of two years or is suffering from leprosy or a virulent venereal disease”

Dr B.R Ambedkar Open University Act, 1982IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Dravidian University Act, 1997IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Employment Service Act (Article 48)TaiwanImmigration related laws

Based on the Regulations Governing Management of the Health Examination of Employed Aliens, No visa, employment permit or extension of employment permit shall be issued to any individual failing in any one item of the health examination.

Environmental Health Services Regulations, 2003DominicaSegregation/separation

Compulsory segregation of people affected by leprosy (lists leprosy as a First Schedule disease).

Family Courts (Patna High Court) Rules, 2000]IndiaMarriage/Divorce

Virulent and incurable form of leprosy is a ground for divorce. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Federal Law Number 28 of 2005 (Article 112)United Arab EmiratesMarriage/Divorce

If one of the parties has leprosy, obstruction of genital canals, or insanity before or during the marriage, the spouse could ask for the marriage’s rescission.

GCA 10GuamSegregation/separation

Sections 3309-3321; 3328; and 3333 allow for several forms of discrimination on the basis of leprosy. These include requirement to isolate; police enforcement of isolation; destruction of property; closure of schools; specific disposal of corpses; restrictions to enter country.

 

 

Goa University Act, 1984IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from contagious leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University and also removal from a position of authority for non-teaching staff and academic staff. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Goa, Daman and Diu Prevention of Begging Act, 1972IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of people affected by leprosy from beggary homes to leprosy asylums. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955IndiaVoting related

People affected by leprosy are not eligible to stand for election. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Haryana Prevention of Beggary Act, 1971IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of people affected by leprosy from beggary homes to leprosy asylums. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Haryana Shri Mata Mansa Devi Shrine Act, 1991IndiaSegregation/separation

Disqualification from membership on the Board for persons suffering with contagious leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Hindu Marriage (High Court of Meghalaya) Rules 2013IndiaMarriage/Divorce

Virulent and incurable form of leprosy is a ground for divorce. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997IndiaSegregation/separation

Disqualification from membership and removal from continuation on the Board for persons suffering from leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Immigrant visaPhilippinesImmigration related laws

Leprosy is classified as Class A disease (Dangerous or contagious), people affected by leprosy are denied immigration visa – Law under review

Immigration Act, B.E. 2522 (1979)ThailandImmigration related laws

Excludes people diagnosed with leprosy from entering and taking up residency in the Kingdom

Immigration Control Act 7 of 1993NamibiaImmigration related laws

People affected by leprosy are not allowed to enter the country.

Infectious Disease Act, 1977SingaporeSegregation/separation

People affected by leprosy may be detained and isolated in hospitals or other places

Inland Steam Vessels (Madhya Pradesh) Rules, 1962IndiaPublic transportation

Restriction and separation of person suffering from leprosy aboard vessels. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Internal Security ActSingaporeSegregation/separation

If a detained person appears to the officer-in-charge to be a leper, the officer-in-charge may, by order in writing, direct his removal to any Government hospital, there to be kept and treated until cured of his leprosy.

Jammu and Kashmir Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1999IndiaMarriage/Divorce

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for divorce. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Jammu and Kashmir Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1960IndiaMarriage/Divorce

The wife shall have the right to live separately from her husband if he is suffering from a virulent form of leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Jammu and Kashmir Hindu Marriage Act, 1980IndiaMarriage/Divorce

Virulent and incurable form of leprosy is a ground for divorce. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Jammu and Kashmir Motor Vehicles Act, 1998IndiaSegregation/separation

People affected by leprosy are not eligible to obtain a driving license or drive a public service vehicle

Jammu and Kashmir Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Act, 2000IndiaSegregation/separation

Disqualification from membership on the Board for persons suffering with contagious leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Jammu and Kashmir Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Act, 1988IndiaSegregation/separation

Disqualification from membership on the Board for persons suffering with contagious leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Jawaharlal Nehru University Act, 1966IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from contagious leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University and also removal from a position of authority for non-teaching staff and academic staff. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Karnataka Municipalities (Regulation and Inspection of Lodging and Boarding Houses) (Model) Bye-Laws, 1966IndiaSegregation/separation

No person affected by leprosy to be allowed inside, to occupy, handle or work in the designated areas under the Act. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964IndiaSegregation/separation

Duty to expel persons suffering from leprosy from market areas leading to segregation. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Karnataka Rajya Dr Gangubai Hangal Sangeetha Mattu Pradarshaka Kalegala Vishwavidyalaya Act, 2009IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of persons affected from membership of the university. Active law, under challenge in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) being heard in the Supreme Court (SC) of India on discriminatory laws against persons affected by leprosy.

Karnataka Samskrita Vishwavidyalaya Act, 2009IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of persons affected from membership of the university. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Kerala Document Writers’ Licence Rules, 1960IndiaEmployment

A leper to be disqualified from getting a license leading to loss of employment opportunity. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Kerala Fishermen Welfare Societies (Determination of Strength of Committees and Conduct of Election) Rules, 1980IndiaEmployment

Disqualification from being a member of the committee if affected by leprosy. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Kerala Habitual Offenders Rules, 1963IndiaSegregation/separation

Provides for a registered offender to be sent to a leprosy asylum on his/her choice with restriction of movement out of there. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Kerala Kahadi and Village Industries Board Act, 1957IndiaEmployment

Disqualified from being or continuing as a member of the Board if suffering from leprosy. Active Act, under challenge in the PIL in SC of India

Kerala Places of Public Resort Rules, 1965IndiaSegregation/separation

Restriction on allowance of people affected by leprosy in public resorts and for mandatory reporting to health officer. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Law no. 76-03SenegalSegregation/separation

In 1976, Law 65 -128 about leprosy villages replaced law 76-03 which re-designated leprosy villages across Senegal to “villages of social rehabilitation”. However, they are still stigmatised and not well integrated into local communities and villages.

Leper Enactment Act 1926MalaysiaSegregation/separation

Compulsory notification and isolation of leprosy patients

Lepers Act 1937DominicaSegregation/separation

Compulsory segregation of people affected by leprosy

Leprosy Suppression Ordinance, 1923Papua New GuineaSegregation/separation

Forced segregation and isolation of leprosy patients

Loi 98-036MaliSegregation/separation

High Commissioner of the region or the District of Bamako has the right to order the hospitalisation of people diagnosed with leprosy.

Madhya Bharat Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple Act, 1953IndiaSegregation/separation

Disqualification from membership on the Board for persons suffering with contagious leprosy and removal of any panda (pandit working at the temple) if suffering from leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Madhya Pradesh Bhiksha Vrittinivaran Adhiniyam, 1973IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of people affected by leprosy from beggary homes to leprosy asylums. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Madhya Pradesh Gram Panchayat (Regulation of Slaughter House) Rules, 1998IndiaSegregation/separation

Restrictions on persons suffering from leprosy to enter slaughter house premises. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Madras Panchayats Act,1958IndiaVoting related

Not eligible to stand for election or continue in office if suffering from leprosy leading to segregation and denial of political participation. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Madras University Act, 1923IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from contagious leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University and also removal from a position of authority. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Madurai- Kamaraj University Act, 1965IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Maharashtra Prevention of Begging Act, 1959IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of people affected by leprosy from beggary homes to leprosy asylums. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Meat Industries Act 1996 (NT) s 42; Meat Industries Regulations 1997 (NT) r 64, sch 3AustraliaSegregation/separation

Persons who have reason to believe they are infected with or affected by leprosy must not enter or remain at an establishment from which meat for human consumption is dispatched; a holder of a licence permitting the dispatch of meat for human consumption who has reason to believe a person is infected with or affected by leprosy, must not permit that person to enter or remain at an establishment operated under that licence.

Metro Railways (Carriage and Ticket) Rules, 2014IndiaPublic transportation

Restriction on travel of persons with leprosy. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Midwives Registration Ordinance (Cap. 162)Hong KongEmployment

The regulatory authority of midwives having the discretion to prohibit registered midwives suffering from any such scheduled infectious disease from attending women in childbirth.

Migration Act 1958 (Cth)AustraliaImmigration related laws

Requirement of persons with leprosy to provide a health undertaking in order to obtain visa; undertaking requirements include reporting to the health clinic to which they are referred, placing themselves under the health clinic’s professional supervision, and undergoing any required course of treatment or investigation.

Mother Teresa Women’s University Act, 1984IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Nagarjuna University Act, 1976IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from contagious leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University and also removal from a position of authority for non-teaching staff and academic staff. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Nathdwara Temple Act, 1959IndiaSegregation/separation

Disqualification from membership on the Board for persons suffering from leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Nepal’s Civil Code (Mulki Ain) 2074 B.S.NepalMarriage/Divorce

According to Part 3, Family Law, Article 1, Marriage Law, Code 71, 2 (c), it is against the law to marry (by deceit) or assist to marry off (by deceit) people with hearing/speaking disability, blind and leprosy affected. Law under review

Non-immigrant or immigrant visaUSAImmigration related laws

People affected by leprosy are not eligible for visas

North-Eastern Hill University Act, 1973IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from contagious leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University and also removal from a position of authority for non-teaching staff and academic staff. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Notifiable diseaseUSAImmigration related laws
Nurses (Registration and Disciplinary Procedure) Regulations (Cap. 164A)Hong KongEmployment

Medical certificate required for a nurse to certify that she is not suffering from any such disease (as part of her application to register)

Nurses and Midwives Act, 1953IndiaEmployment

Disqualification for being or continuing as a member of the council if affected by leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

On the Education of the Leper, 1960NigerSegregation/separation

“If the search for the Hansen bacillus is positive, the child will be temporarily evicted from the school for a period of one year”

Orissa (Licensing of) Deed Writers’ Rules, 1979IndiaEmployment

Disqualification from grant of license to a person suffering from leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in SC of India

Orissa Municipal Act, 1950IndiaSegregation/separation

Leprosy patients are not eligible to stand for election or continue in a post in the municipality and can also be expelled from market places. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Orissa Municipal Corporation Act, 2003IndiaVoting related

Not eligible to stand in elections of a corporator if affected by leprosy at the time of nomination leading to segregation and denial of political participation. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Orissa Professional Typists for Civil and Criminal Courts (Registration) Rules, 1981IndiaEmployment

Not eligible to register or continue as a typist if a leprosy patient. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in SC of India

Osmania University Act, 1959IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University and also removal from a position of authority. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Pakistan Fish Inspection and Quality Control Act, 1997PakistanEmployment

No Person who is suffering from leprosy, tuberculosis, polio or such other contagious diseases, shall handle, carry or process fish or work in a fish processing and packing plant or establishment

Pondicherry Excise Rules, 1970IndiaEmployment

Discontinuation of the licence if the person is suffering from leprosy and restriction on employing person suffering from leprosy. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Pondicherry University Act, 1985IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University and also removal from a position of authority for non-teaching staff and academic staff. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Potti Sreeramulu Telugu University Act, 1985IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Prevention and Control of Disease Ordinance (Cap. 599)ChinaSegregation/separation

Leprosy is expressly defined as a “Scheduled Infectious Disease” in HK’s main public health legislation. This definition includes diseases such as COVID-19, Anthrax, Chickenpox and Cholera.

Prisons Act, 1933SingaporeSegregation/separation

Where a prisoner appears to be suffering from leprosy, the Minister may, by order in writing, direct his removal to any hospital or place specified by the Director of Medical Services.

Puducherry Municipalities Act, 1973IndiaSegregation/separation

Duty to expel persons suffering from leprosy from market areas leading to segregation. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976IndiaSegregation/separation

Duty to expel persons suffering from leprosy from market areas leading to segregation. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Railways Act, 1906SingaporePublic transportation

Persons suffering from leprosy are not allowed to travel by railway

Republic Act No. 4073, 1964PhilippinesSegregation/separation

Segregation and isolation of persons affected by leprosy.

Shri Sanwaliaji Temple Act, 1992IndiaSegregation/separation

Disqualification from membership on the Board for persons suffering from leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Shri Shiv Khori Shrine Act, 2008IndiaSegregation/separation

Disqualification from membership on the Board for persons suffering with contagious leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Sri Krishnadevaraya University Act, 1981IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from contagious leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University and also removal from a position of authority for non-teaching staff and academic staff. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Sri Venkateswara Vedic University Act, 2006IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Statute Law Chapter 238 Lepers Act, 1928BahamasEmployment
Swimming Pools RegulationHong KongSegregation/separation

Persons affected by communicable diseases, including leprosy, are denied access to private (Cap. 123CA) and public (Cap. 132BR) swimming pools.

Tamil Nadu Excise Act, 1971IndiaEmployment

Provides for non-employment of persons suffering from leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959IndiaSegregation/separation

Disqualification from membership or continuation on the Trust for persons suffering from leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Tamil Nadu Prevention of Begging Act, 1945IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of persons affected by leprosy from beggary homes and/or juvenile homes to leprosy asylums for indefinite periods. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Tamil University Act, 1982IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of persons affected from membership of the university. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Telangana Micro Brewery Rules, 2015IndiaEmployment

Bar on persons suffering from leprosy to acquire a license if they are to personally handle the stocks leading to denial of employment. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL in SC of India

Telugu University Act, 1985IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

The Andhra Pradesh Ayurvedic and Homeopathic Medical Practitioners Registration Act, 1956IndiaEmployment

Disqualified from being or continuing as a member of the committee if suffering from leprosy. Active Act, under challenge in the PIL in SC of India

The Immigration ActBarbadosImmigration related laws

In computing the period of residence required for the acquisition of the status of permanent resident, no period may be counted during which a person is confined to a prison or is an inmate of a hospital for treatment of leprosy or mental disorder.

The Leper’s Ordinance, 1901Sri LankaSegregation/separation

A cabinet paper has been handed over to the Ministry of Health and is currently being reviewed by the legal department of the Ministry of health prior to submission.

The Leprosy Act, 1949JamaicaSegregation/separation

Compulsory detention of leprosy patients

The Rajasthan Rehabilitation of Beggars or Indigents Act, 2012IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of people affected by leprosy from beggary homes to leprosy asylums. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

The Telangana Prevention of Begging Act, 1977IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of people affected by leprosy from beggary homes to leprosy asylums. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

Travancore Cochin Public Health Act, 1955IndiaSegregation/separation

Allows for the segregation of person suffering from leprosy from public conveyances, schools, colleges, public libraries, reading rooms and creation of separate segregation areas. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

University of Health Sciences Act, 1986IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

University of Hyderabad Act, 1974IndiaSegregation/separation

Suffering from contagious leprosy is a ground for disqualification from nomination or membership of any authority of the University and also removal from a position of authority for non-teaching staff and academic staff. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

US 8 USCS § 1285USAEmployment

Employment on passenger vessels of aliens afflicted with certain disabilities, including leprosy, is prohibited.

Uttar Pradesh Co- operative Societies (45th Amendment) Rules, 2006IndiaEmployment

Disqualified from being or continuing as a member of the committee if suffering from leprosy. Active rule, under challenge in the PIL in SC of India

Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Beggary Act, 1975IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of people affected by leprosy from beggary homes to leprosy asylums. Active law, under challenge in the PIL at the SC of India

VI 19 V.I.C. § 77Virgin IslandsSegregation/separation

All known contacts with a person afflicted with Hansen’s disease, including all family connections, by blood or marriage and all persons known to have Hansen’s disease, resident in the Virgin Islands, shall submit to examinations by the Commissioner of Health or by a physician licensed to practice in the Virgin Islands at intervals not to exceed 12 months during the first 10 years following the last contact and thereafter at the discretion of the Commissioner of Health.

Virgin Islands 19 V.I.C. § 79Virgin IslandsSegregation/separation

Persons affected by leprosy, and contacts, who fail to submit to necessary examinations will be fined (up to 100 USD) or imprisoned (up to 180 days) or both.

Visva Bharati Act, 1951IndiaSegregation/separation

Removal of teaching or non-teaching academic staff on the grounds of having contagious leprosy. Active law, under challenge in the PIL in the SC of India

Making a difference in policy and practice

The UN Principles and Guidelines for elimination of the discrimination against persons affected by leprosy and their family members were adopted in 2010. Six years later, Mathias Duck, a member of ILEP’s Advisory Panel, undertook research to find out if they were put into practice. He received responses to a questionnaire from 265 people affected by leprosy is 20 countries about their experience of stigma. Respondents included men and women, old and young, and 67% with visible (Grade 2) disabilities. All had been affected by leprosy for at least one year; 40% had been for 15 years.

The survey explored four major areas where stigma can be found: where someone might be allowed to live, how they experience work, marriage and access to public places.

Residence

Only half of Mathias’s respondents said that they were free to choose where they wished to live.


Work

More than a third of respondents thought that people affected by leprosy were not treated equally at work in terms of hiring and promotion. Two thirds had experienced discrimination.


Marriage

More than half of the respondents thought that leprosy was often or frequently used as a reason for a denial of marriage or grounds for a divorce. In some countries, (China, Liberia, Guinea Bissau and Afghanistan) this figure was much higher.


Access

Less than half of those surveyed said that people affected by leprosy enjoyed equal access to public spaces and that included transportation.


Discriminatory language

More than a third experienced discriminatory language being used against them. One in five respondents heard discriminatory language used against other people.


Recurring themes experienced by people affected by leprosy were as follows:

  • abandoned by family or forced to leave home. (Two in five respondents knew others affected by leprosy who were separated from their family because of their diagnosis)
  • fear of leprosy
  • visible signs of leprosy seem to worsen stigma and climate of secrecy
  • problems using public transport

Participation in Policy-making

Mathias asked his group of respondents if people affected by leprosy are involved in decision-making for policies that impact on their lives and a third responded that they were not involved. However, one fifth had been involved.

State involvement

12% or one in eight respondents were aware of action taken by a state to abolish existing discriminatory laws. 15% confirmed the state’s involvement in family reunification, many people (46%) were not aware of the state’s involvement in family reunification. A quarter of respondents said that the state did not provide information about leprosy to community leaders.  Mathias said that there was little or no evidence of the state’s active involvement as per these statistics.

In conclusion, Mathias summarised that:

  • Discriminatory practices and language are still largely part of the experience of persons affected by leprosy.
  • There is little or no evidence of the state´s involvement in the elimination of discrimination against persons affected by leprosy.
  • The participation of people affected by leprosy is still limited.

In commenting on the findings, Mathias said “It’s great to have the Principles and Guidelines. It’s great to have inclusion as part of the WHO global leprosy strategy, as well as the ILEP strategy. We now need very concrete steps to be taken both at the international and the national level. We know that the Principles and Guidelines represent an ideal that seems very far away in the case of many countries.”

He quoted a Paraguayan proverb “Del dicho al hecho hay un largo trecho” (“from saying to action there is a long way”) and he urged policy makers to keep moving in that direction so that every year, every month, every week and every day, the Principles and Guidelines become more and more real in the lives of people affected by leprosy so every person affected can experience inclusion in their everyday life.

To harm or to heal: the power of words

Mathias Duck, Chair of the ILEP Panel of Men and Women Affected by Leprosy, shares his personal perspective on why it is important not to use the ‘L’ word

Words have power.

Sometimes we give them more power than they should have.

Sometimes we underestimate their power.

Power to encourage or power to discourage.

It’s not just how it is said, but how it is heard and perceived.

The ‘L’ word carries thousands of years of baggage, negative images, preconceived notions, prejudice, myths and stigma. It perpetuates these images, labels people affected and degrades us.

It’s not always meant that way, but that is the effect. It’s part of the English language, part of some laws (in some countries) and part of sacred texts. This makes it even more complex, because the use of the term is enabled and perhaps even blessed.

When we try to reduce stigma, language is important. It is not magic, in the sense that getting rid of the ‘L’ word will eliminate stigma automatically. However, it is a crucial step. In Paraguay this has happened with people living with HIV. A deliberate effort was made to avoid a discriminatory word, while at the same time providing people with respectful alternatives. Over time it helps to change people’s perception.

Words can degrade, but they can also contribute to a sense of dignity and respect.

Statements, submissions and briefings

TopicTitleDescriptionCountryDateDownload
CRPD CommitteeILEP briefing on leprosy to CRPD Committee side event

This is the first formal briefing on leprosy by ILEP to the CRPD Committee. It was delivered to a lunchtime briefing session on leprosy in April 2019. It introduces leprosy as a human rights issue and urges the Committee to include leprosy in the scope of the CRPD Convention.

GeneralApril 2019Download
WHO NTDs STAGILEP partner statement

ILEP outlined its current strategies in connection with the main themes of the WHO NTDs Roadmap and urged the inclusion of leprosy among NTDs that are the subject of current WHO studies regarding the effects of the Covid pandemic

GeneralSeptember 2022Download
International Leprosy CongressILEP plenary statement

At the opening plenary of the Congress, ILEP used the four collaborative projects agreed by Members in June 2022 as a framework to describe ILEP’s emerging priorities and what these priorities say about the role of ILEP in the coming two to three years.

GeneralNovember 2022Download
2nd International Symposium at the Vatican on Hansen’s DiseaseILEP statement

ILEP outlined how it works towards zero leprosy, specifically referring to the conclusions and recommendations from the first Vatican symposium in 2016

GeneralJanuary 2023Download
CRPD CommitteeILEP statement on impact of COVID-19 on persons affected by leprosy, to opening CRPD Committee session

This statement summarised the results of a survey of organisations of persons affected by leprosy about the impact of the pandemic and drew particular attention to intersectionality, where vulnerability caused by leprosy worsens, and is made worse by, other vulnerabilities.

GeneralMarch 2021Download
CRPD CommitteeILEP statement on key themes on human rights and leprosy to opening CRPD Committee session

This statement was delivered during the NGO briefings to the opening session of the 22nd CRPD Committee. It introduces the main themes included in the country-specific ILEP submissions to the 22nd session and the 12th pre-session.

GeneralAugust 2019Download
CRPD CommitteeILEP submission in relation to CRPD Committee’s draft General Comment on Article 27

This submission drew the Committee’s attention to leprosy-specific issues related to the right to work and commented on the draft General Comment from a leprosy perspective. It urged the Committee to explicitly reference leprosy in its final draft.

GeneralMarch 2021Download
Committee on the Rights of the ChildILEP submission on ending discrimination against children from families affected by leprosy in Vietnam

This submission to the 87th pre-session of the Committee on the Rights of the Child recommended a set of actions by the government to protect the rights of children from families affected by leprosy, in line with the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

VietnamMarch 2020Download
CRPD CommitteeILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in China

This submission to the 13th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee recommended inclusion in the List of Issues of a set of inclusions assuring the human rights of persons affected by leprosy in China, especially regarding the plight of older people and the leprosy villages.

ChinaFebruary 2020Download
CRPD CommitteeILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in India

This submission to the India country briefing at the 22nd CRPD session recommended, among other actions, immediate steps to repeal or amend the 108 discriminatory acts in force in India and to pass the proposed Elimination of Discrimination against Persons affected by Leprosy (EDPAL) legislation.

IndiaSeptember 2019Download
CRPD CommitteeILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Lao PDR

This submission to the 12th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee recommended inclusions on human rights and leprosy in the List of Issues for Lao PDR.

Lao PDRSeptember 2019Download
CRPD CommitteeILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Mexico

This submission to the 12th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee recommended inclusions on human rights and leprosy in the List of Issues for Mexico.

MexicoSeptember 2019Download
CRPD CommitteeILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Myanmar

This submission to the Myanmar country briefing at the 22nd CRPD session recommended a set of actions to improve the human rights situation of persons affected by leprosy in Myanmar.

MyanmarAugust 2019Download
CRPD CommitteeILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Singapore

This submission to the 12th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee recommended repeal or amendment of four discriminatory laws in the List of Issues for Singapore.

SingaporeSeptember 2019Download
CRPD CommitteeILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Venezuela

This submission to the 12th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee recommended inclusions on human rights and leprosy in the List of Issues for Venezuela.

VenezuelaSeptember 2019Download
Global Disability SummitILEP’s commitments on disability inclusion

ILEP joined several hundred organisations in making a set of commitments, about what ILEP will do in the next 3-4 years towards disability inclusion, including the meaningful engagement of organisations representing persons affected by leprosy.

GeneralFebruary 2022Download
WHO Skin NTDs FrameworkIntegration with Skin NTDs on the road to zero leprosy

Responding to prepared questions, ILEP expressed its view on the advantages and disadvantages of the new Skin NTDs Framework in relation to leprosy

GeneralJune 2022Download
Universal Periodic ReviewReport on human rights situation of persons affected by leprosy in Mozambique

ILEP partnered in this submission by three of its member associations and two organisations of persons affected by leprosy to the 38th cycle of the Universal Periodic Review, with recommendations to prevent ongoing social exclusion and provide adequate care to persons affected by leprosy in Mozambique.

MozambiqueOctober 2020Download
Universal Periodic ReviewReport on human rights situation of persons affected by leprosy in Sierra Leone

ILEP and one of its member associations supported this submission written by the National Association of Persons Affected by Leprosy in Sierra Leone to the 38th cycle of the Universal Periodic Review, with recommendations to address issues related to stigma and discrimination and  support persons affected by leprosy into employment, inclusion and independent living.

Sierra LeoneOctober 2020Download
Universal Periodic ReviewReport on the human rights status of persons affected by leprosy and disability in Papua New Guinea

ILEP partnered with The Leprosy Mission PNG and two local coalitions of persons with disabilities in this submission to the 39th cycle of the Universal Periodic Review, with recommendations to uphold and protect the rights of persons affected by leprosy and persons with disabilities in Papua New Guinea.

Papua New GuineaApril 2021Download
Universal Periodic ReviewReport on the human rights status of persons affected by leprosy and disability in Timor Leste

ILEP partnered with The Leprosy Mission Timor Leste and five local organisations or coalitions of persons with disabilities in this submission to the 40th cycle of the Universal Periodic Review, with recommendations to uphold and protect the rights of persons affected by leprosy and persons with disabilities in Timor Leste.

Timor LesteAugust 2021Download
Universal Periodic ReviewReport on the human rights status of persons affected by leprosy in Nepal

ILEP partnered in this submission to the 37th cycle of the Universal Periodic Review of recommendations to prevent ongoing social exclusion and stigmatisation of persons affected by leprosy in Nepal.

NepalJune 2020Download
CEDAW CommitteeReport on the situation of women affected by leprosy in Indonesia

ILEP supported this submission by 14 organisations in Indonesia to the  78th pre-session of the CEDAW Committee. It proposes a series of government actions to promote the rights of women affected by leprosy in Indonesia within the CEDAW framework.

IndonesiaJune 2020Download
Universal Periodic ReviewReport on the stigma and discrimination faced by persons affected by leprosy in Myanmar

ILEP supported this submission by one of its member associations and a civil society organisation in Myanmar to the 37th cycle of the Universal Periodic Review, containing recommendations to prevent ongoing social exclusion and boost the inclusion of persons affected by leprosy in Myanmar.

MyanmarJune 2020Download
Bergen International Conference on Hansen's diseaseSpeech on NGO role in combatting stigma

The ILEP CEO proposed six ways in which ILEP members and other NGOs can contribute to the goal of zero leprosy-related stigma and discrimination. He also suggested reasons why States are slow to repeal and amend discriminatory laws.

GeneralJune 2023Download
Human Rights CouncilStatement in response to report by UN Special Rapporteur

ILEP’s statement welcomed the report and recommendations of the UN Special Rapporteur and emphasised the need for a whole-government approach to ending discrimination in healthcare, education and employment.

GeneralJune 2021Download
Human Rights CouncilStatement in support of Special Rapporteur – Leprosy presentation to Human Rights Council

ILEP supported the framework for inclusion recommended in the presentation of Alice Cruz to the Human Rights Council and urged renewal of her mandate as Special Rapporteur.

GeneralJuly 2020Download
Human Rights CouncilStatement in support of Special Rapporteur’s presentation to the Human Rights Council

ILEP supported the Special Rapporteur’s report and recommendations related to the right of people affected by leprosy to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

GeneralJune 2022Download
Human Rights CouncilStatement in support of Special Rapporteur’s presentation to the Human Rights Council

ILEP’s statement welcomed the report and gave ILEP’s own perspective on the achievements of the mandate during the past six years. It also highlighted the long list of remaining challenges and the related recommendations of the UN Special Rapporteur, and echoed the call by organisations of persons affected by leprosy to extend the mandate.

GeneralJune 2023Download
CRPD Conference of State PartiesStatement on livelihoods and the right to work, for persons affected by leprosy

At a side event, ILEP proposed a set of interlocking approaches through which NGOs can work with governments to promote livelihoods and the financial independence of people affected by leprosy so that they are not even more left behind.

GeneralJune 2021Download
Advocacy workshopStatement regarding discriminatory legislation

ILEP urged repeal of the discriminatory marriage law, with reference to Nepal’s obligations under the CRPD Convention and other relevant factors

NepalSeptember 2022Download
CRPD CommitteeSubmission in relation to initial CRPD report of Bangladesh

This submission to the Bangladesh country briefing at the 23rd CRPD session proposed a set of actions to improve the human rights situation of persons affected by leprosy in Bangladesh.

BangladeshFebruary 2020Download
CRPD CommitteeSubmission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Angola

ILEP supported this submission by two civil society organizations in Angola to the 13th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee. It recommends inclusion in the List of Issues of a range of actions to reduce stigma, poverty and human rights abuses suffered by people affected by leprosy in Angola.

AngolaFebruary 2020Download
CRPD CommitteeSubmission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Indonesia

ILEP supported this submission by 14 civil society organizations in Indonesia to the 13th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee. It recommends inclusion in the List of Issues of a set of measures promoting the rights of persons with leprosy related disabilities in Indonesia within the CRPD framework.

IndonesiaFebruary 2020Download
CEDAW CommitteeSubmission on ending discrimination against women affected by leprosy in Ethiopia

ILEP supported this submission by one of its Member associations to the 72nd session of the CEDAW Committee covering government actions to improve the human rights situation of women affected by leprosy in Ethiopia.

EthiopiaFebruary 2019Download
CRPD CommitteeSubmission on human rights of persons affected by leprosy in Pakistan

ILEP coordinated a submission to the 19th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee recommending inclusion in the List of Issues of a set of measures assuring the human rights of persons with disabilities, including persons affected by leprosy, in Pakistan, especially regarding the plight of older people and the leprosy villages.

PakistanJanuary 2024Download
World Health AssemblySubmission on UHC

ILEP supported a constituency statement urging Member States to champion health equity for persons with disabilities, and ensure accessibility of person-centred primary health care close to where people live and reaching the furthest behind first.

GeneralMay 2023Download
WHO South East Asia Regional CommitteeWritten statement regarding impact of COVID-19 on persons affected by leprosy

ILEP summarised key concerns around COVID-19 and urged WHO and Ministries to work with leprosy program managers on safe and effective transition to the ‘new normal’ and innovative approaches to the continuum of care during ongoing pandemic.

GeneralSeptember 2020Download
WHO Western Pacific Regional CommitteeWritten statement regarding impact of COVID-19 on persons affected by leprosy

ILEP summarised key concerns around COVID-19 and urged WHO and Ministries to work with leprosy program managers on safe and effective transition to the ‘new normal’ and innovative approaches to the continuum of care during ongoing pandemic.

GeneralOctober 2020Download

UN Principles and Guidelines

In 2010 the UN General Assembly and the Human Rights Council adopted the Principles and Guidelines for elimination of the discrimination against persons affected by leprosy and their family members. These Principles and Guidelines make national governments responsible to eliminate leprosy-related discrimination. They form an excellent roadmap on how to enforce legally binding human rights that are routinely violated towards persons affected by leprosy and their family members. Many of the Principles and Guidelines mirror the rights enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The preamble of the CRPD recognises the need to promote and protect the human rights of all persons with disabilities, including those who require more intensive support. ILEP argues that persons with leprosy-related disabilities or disadvantaged by the label ‘leprosy’ are the very ones who need this intensive support.

Regrettably, the Principles and Guidelines are non-mandatory and have largely been ignored, so that at state and community level, the same human rights abuses persist. Nevertheless, ILEP routinely refers to the Principles and Guidelines in submissions to the various human rights instruments of the OHCHR. Through this, we urge governments to implement the Principles and Guidelines as a significant contribution to enabling persons affected by leprosy to live with dignity.

Download PDF

Rachna’s story

Rachna Kumari was 24 when she discovered she had leprosy. The crippling stigma that she experienced has enabled her to understand and help those living with the disease in Bihar, India.

Her husband supported her when she was diagnosed with leprosy but due an unfortunate incident, he died.  She was compelled by circumstances to raise her children on her own.

“When I got this disease, the attitude of the family and society changed completely. They deserted me, which made me heart-broken and even more, made me think why is this happening? As I am cured today, I have the opportunity to serve people affected by leprosy. I understand my rights and I am working to help others and also taking care of my children. Why cannot others also have this life?”

“I just say one thing to people with leprosy. We have to bring them into mainstream life without any discrimination.”

Today Rachna also sits on the ILEP Advisory Panel of men and women affected by leprosy, working towards Zero Discrimination so others will not suffer the loneliness and isolation she did.

Girls & women affected by leprosy

Women affected by leprosy already make up some of the worlds’ poorest and most marginalised groups. In many societies, girls and women with disabilities are particularly vulnerable to abuse. Gender is therefore an important area of ILEP’s focus. We are committed to working with partners to help tackle this inequality and protect the dignity and human rights of all people affected by leprosy.

Girls and women affected by leprosy are triply discriminated against because of their gender, the disabilities that can result from the disease and the stigma associated with it.

Abandoned and socially vulnerable

A recent review noted that women affected by leprosy are at risk of being abandoned and socially vulnerable. Some women with leprosy are sexually abused.

Violence

A study in Nepal by ILEP colleagues found that women affected by leprosy experienced a higher degree of sexual abuse by husbands than other women (with or without disabilities).

Not only is violence against women a significant public health problem, it is also a fundamental violation of women’s human rights. Research has highlighted that there is still much to be done in our advocacy for women and leprosy. ILEP continues to shine a spotlight on the challenges of leprosy and how it affects women, particularly as it pushes for Zero Transmission, Zero Disability and Zero Discrimination.

Violence against women takes many forms including but not restricted to: domestic abuse, rape, child abuse, prostitution, human trafficking, psychological abuse, economic abuse, forced marriage and ‘honour’ crimes.

Worldwide, one in three women (35%) is physically or sexually abused during her lifetime; most of this is intimate partner violence.

Violence against women constrains poverty reduction efforts by reducing women’s participation in the community and lowers women’s access to education.

Click here to read Kalpana’s story; a woman affected by leprosy, subjected to violence from her husband, supported by Lepra and several years later, building a business and a new life.

Neru’s Story: Losing out on childhood and schooling

Neru was only eight when she discovered she had leprosy. Her mother had noticed patches on Neru’s body and Neru also complained of numbness in her right hand and right leg. As time went on this numbness worsened and her hand began to stiffen and she could no longer open or close her hand, or hold things easily. Her mother took her to a government hospital where she was diagnosed with an aggressive form of leprosy and started on a multi-drug therapy. Neru did not realise how serious the diagnosis was and what impact it could have. “The doctor told me that I had leprosy, I did not feel anything but I could see my mother was very sad” she says.

Although Neru was started on a year’s course of the drugs, the prejudice and discrimination she faced showed that a physical cure was not all that she would need.

“I went to school the next day and the dinner lady, just as I approached her with a plate for food, shouted at me and told me that ‘you don’t need to come to school anymore’. After that me and the other students affected by leprosy ran from the school to home. I felt so sad about it and I cried a lot. I decided not to go school again and stopped my studies.”

This stigmatization of Neru extended to her family and her life outside of her education. “We were taking water from the hand pump near school,” she says, “People did not allow us to take water from that hand pump and were telling us that we may spread leprosy to other village people. We decided to go further away to get drinking water.”

After such treatment, it was hard for Neru not to absorb this feeling of shame: “I also felt that I have very serious disease which may spread to my family members so I just kept my distance from them and I was hiding my hand when people came to my home. I was frightened about the people in our village, I could not go anywhere to play.”

Although she had completed the year’s course of the multi-drug therapy, leprosy had caused Neru to lose out on her childhood; it had prevented her from being a part of a community and meant that for more than two years, she stopped her education.

As part of ILEP Member Lepra’s outreach, they give talks to communities, and one day they visited Neru’s village. They were able to explain to her mother how they could help her daughter with reconstructive surgery, and how they would be able to provide the funding, as well as pre- and post-operative physiotherapy. The surgery, along with the physiotherapy would mean Neru would have to stay in the hospital for 45 days. But with this treatment, she would regain full use of her arm and leg.

In the late spring of 2017, Neru had reconstructive surgery at the St Joseph Leprosy Centre in Madhya Pradesh. By this point, she had also developed a partial foot drop on her right leg, which meant she could no longer lift her foot at the ankle. She had a course of physiotherapy and Lepra also gave her customised protective footwear to strengthen her ankle muscles. With Lepra’s help, and through determination and family support, Neru was able to make a recovery. She could walk more easily and use her hand again.

She began to regain some of the confidence that she used to have. At the centre, she made friends and found new support from the people she met during her treatment. She also started to study once more and, as her community had heard our health awareness talks, they no longer feared the disease so she was able to use the village water pump again. However, Neru was still frightened to go back to school, worried of how she would be treated there.

Because Lepra recognizes the broad and damaging affects leprosy can have, they don’t just supply medical treatment, but emotional and practical support to individuals and family’s living with the disease. They visited the school and told the teachers her story and they were happy to allow her back, even after almost a three-year gap.

She even met the dinner lady who had turned her away: the woman took her hand, looked at it, and said how glad she was to see it healed. She said that she would look to see if any other child was showing symptoms of leprosy and refer them to the government hospital.

At first Neru’s diagnosis seemed like an end to her childhood, her education and her place in the community. Now she has returned to school and what is more wants to become a teacher herself: “I want to become teacher in our village and I will teach all the students very well,” she says.

A life after leprosy

Thy’s mother was a former leprosy patient. She noticed patches on him, and when examined he too was diagnosed with leprosy. Thy’s leprosy was diagnosed and treated early so he won’t run the risk of developing disabilities. This is Thy’s story.


Independence, mobility and dignity

Nigeria, bordered by Benin, Chad, Cameroon and Niger, has the largest population in Africa with over 186 million people. In recent years, conflict has been rife including the brutal and long-running Boko Haram insurgency throughout north-eastern Nigeria, frequent bouts of militancy and piracy in the Niger Delta and increasingly common communal violence across central Nigeria. Despite the country being rich in oil, few Nigerians have benefited and some of the country’s biggest problems include corruption, crime, a lack of infrastructure and unemployment. These issues are hardest on the poor.

Chanchaga Orthopaedic Workshop in Minna, Niger State, Nigeria is one of the few orthopaedic workshops in Nigeria. The workshop produces mobility devices such as prosthetic limbs and moulded shoes for people with leprosy-related impairments and other disabilities, and distributes other devices such as crutches, wheelchairs and protective footwear.

Because of the orthopaedic team marketing their services, by visiting other hospitals and traditional bone setters, an increasing number of paying clients are helping to subsidise the service offered to leprosy affected people. For example, the team was asked to make a specialised brace for two soldiers which was completed to such a high standard that it has led to referrals to the workshop to help other Nigerian soldiers injured during the conflict with Boko Haram.

Photo credit: The Leprosy Mission England & Wales

Nigeria was severely affected by recession throughout 2016 and 2017 caused by the oil price crash, devaluation of the Naira and continued conflict with Boko Haram, and this has doubly impacted the workshop by increasing the costs of component parts and making it harder for potential general patients to afford the workshop’s products and services.

ILEP Member The Leprosy Mission is helping the workshop to become a more sustainable social enterprise: continuing to serve people affected by leprosy for free, but also increasing its customer base to include other people with disabilities and providing a wider range of quality orthopaedic services and products. The workshop is also improving its marketing activities, and upgrading its facilities and services.

Ashar’s story

Photo credit: The Leprosy Mission England & Wales

Ashar is about 50 years old. He has seven siblings, three brothers and four sisters. His parents were farmers and traders. Neither his parents nor his any of his siblings have had leprosy. When he was about 18 years old he noticed that he had discoloured patches on his skin on his face, cheeks and forehead, and he was diagnosed with leprosy in 1985.

For many years he was treated with traditional medicine for his leprosy which had no effect. It was only when he started losing his fingernails that he went to a leprosy hospital where he was treated with the correct multidrug therapy. Because of the characteristic lack of sensation in his feet, Ashar had trodden on stones which pierced his feet and then caused wounds and ulcers and he was confined to a wheelchair. Ashar’s hands are also severely deformed due to leprosy.

The team at Chanchaga Orthopaedic Workshop made some disability aids for Ashar which fit to his wrist using Velcro. He can use these to hold a toothbrush, spoon or torch so that he is more independent. He says, “life is much easier now.”

Binta Alhassan Abubakar: Diagnosis gives answers and hope

At 12 years of age, Binta Alhassan Abubakar began to show signs of being affected by leprosy.

“Nobody knew what the symptoms were,” she said. “My father dismissed it as a common illness which would pass soon. After two years, the symptoms worsened and I was taken to a native medicine man who kept giving me herbal medications to take.”

The illness continued to progress for several years and Binta began to have problems with ulcers that would not heal.

“My legs and hands began to grow worse.

That was when my father took me to Chanchaga Hospital in Minna, Nigeria. Although I started receiving treatment almost immediately, the ulcers had worsened from my legs up to my knees and from my hands up to my wrists.”

Though her recovery was long, afterwards Binta travelled back to her hometown where she married her husband of 18 years.

In 2017, Binta received startup funds to begin a sheep rearing business. The family was able to buy three sheep (two females and one male). They have now raised seven sheep and sold one. With the funds from this sale they were able to pay school fees for their children, buy them books and clothing and they have been eating well.

“What brings us great joy is that the sheep was bought by a rich non- leprosy-affected man. We were glad because our sheep was accepted by others even though they knew we had leprosy,” said Binta.

Sister Julia Thundathil’s story: Fighting the spread of leprosy

A chance encounter between a Catholic nun and a group of elderly people affected by leprosy in the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh more than twenty years ago proved a turning point in the lives of the six leprosy patients – and many hundreds more like them.

“I found them on the roadside with worms coming out of their wounds.” Sister Julia Thundathil recounts of that visit to the village of Sendhwa. They had not eaten for days and their wounds were attracting flies. People often chased them away.

After speaking to them and being moved by their “heartbreaking stories,” the Augustinian nun and trained social worker returned to the convent to get medicine for their wounds and a bucket for bathing. This was not a singular act of compassion – the encounter inspired her to dedicate her life to working to help people affected by leprosy. And crucially, to break the cycle of transmission.

The enclave she went on to set up in Sendhwa is now home to more than 250 leprosy patients from 85 families.

Sister Julia believes that “the hasty spread of leprosy and stigma” is one of the biggest problems facing social workers in the area. She explains that “often to prevent discrimination patients try to hide their disease by not immediately seeking medical help on finding signs of leprosy. Stigma attached to leprosy leads to loss of employment even before manual labour becomes difficult due to disabilities that often result from late or no treatment. It also leads to exclusion from society, causing physical and emotional distress.”

To help halt the transmission of leprosy, staff at the enclave run early detection camps to identify those with the disease, so they can get immediate treatment. Patients are monitored and tracked, and receive health education.

“There are unfortunately still many barriers to stopping this preventable disease once and for all,” she says. “There is a shortage of accessibility to water and sanitation; there are delays in beginning treatment for patients, including insufficient medicine and not enough doctors; and there is the crippling social stigma and discrimination.”

As well as personally caring for those living with leprosy, Sister Julia tirelessly advocates for early diagnosis and treatment (through improvements in the government health system and leprosy screening) as well as programmes to reduce the level of stigma in the community. She believes both approaches are needed to reduce and ultimately stop the spread of the disease.

The social benefits gained from ending leprosy, she reflects, will be immense. “I believe that if we can successfully stop the spread of this crippling disease, we will see a day of zero transmission of disability which leads to zero disability, leads to zero stigma and a more inclusive society.’’

Submission in relation to initial CRPD report of Bangladesh

This submission to the Bangladesh country briefing at the 23rd CRPD session proposed a set of actions to improve the human rights situation of persons affected by leprosy in Bangladesh.

Submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Angola

ILEP supported this submission by two civil society organizations in Angola to the 13th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee. It recommends inclusion in the List of Issues of a range of actions to reduce stigma, poverty and human rights abuses suffered by people affected by leprosy in Angola.

Submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Indonesia

ILEP supported this submission by 14 civil society organizations in Indonesia to the 13th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee. It recommends inclusion in the List of Issues of a set of measures promoting the rights of persons with leprosy related disabilities in Indonesia within the CRPD framework.

ILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in China

This submission to the 13th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee recommended inclusion in the List of Issues of a set of inclusions assuring the human rights of persons affected by leprosy in China, especially regarding the plight of older people and the leprosy villages.

ILEP meetings March 2020

Together with The Leprosy Mission International, we are looking forward to welcoming all ILEP Members to Brentford for ILEP’s upcoming meetings, which will take place from 16 to 20 March 2020.

ILEP Conference on Digital Technologies and Leprosy Expertise

The ILEP Conference on Digital Technologies and Leprosy Expertise will take place on Monday 16 to Wednesday 18 March at the Holiday Inn Brentford Lock.

The conference has two interconnected purposes: 1) for ILEP Members to learn from one another’s experiences in the use of innovative digital technologies to improve programmes and services, 2) and to identify possible solutions for the chronic problem of loss of leprosy expertise. It is expected that the outcomes will benefit ILEP, GPZL and the leprosy world as a whole.

The first part of the conference will focus on sharing experiences regarding the application of digital technologies in mapping, diagnostics, patient management and health information systems. Participants will be able to compare the benefits of different approaches and gain awareness of potential new technologies being developed.

The second part of the conference will focus on better understanding the specific levels of leprosy knowledge or capacity required in order to achieve zero leprosy, developing a framework for innovative capacity building packages and understanding the potentials and constraints of using digital technologies to build leprosy knowledge/capacity.

ILEP Communications Network meeting

The 2020 ILEP Communications Network meeting will take place on Tuesday 17 and Wednesday 18 March at the TLMI office. The meeting will focus on three key elements of communications which were identified as being priorities by the network: press readiness, social media and metrics.

ILEP’s Advisory Panel, Technical Commission and Country coordination meetings

The ILEP Advisory Panel, Technical Commission and Country coordination meetings will take place on Thursday 19 March at TLMI office. The Panel and ITC are expected to attend the three-day conference before their meetings on Thursday. The country coordination meeting will focus on India and discuss how collaboration and information sharing can be improved at country level.

ILEP Members Assembly

The ILEP Members Assembly will take place on Friday 20 March at TLMI office. The morning session will include presentations from the WHO Global Leprosy Programme, Novartis and the Global Partnership for Zero Leprosy, as well as reports and recommendations from the Advisory Panel, ITC, Executive Board and Country Coordination workshop. The afternoon session is closed to CEOs and will include discussions on ILEP’s policy and advocacy positions, how to ensure diverse and robust leadership within ILEP, the process and timeline for the development of ILEP’s strategy 2021-2023 and ILEP’s annual and financial reports from 2019.

For more information, please contact Monty Mukhier.

World Leprosy Day 2020

Do you know what you think you know about leprosy?

GENEVA, Switzerland – Imagine having the doctor refuse to treat you years after you have been cured of a disease. Having a nurse step back and adamantly not touch you though you started taking antibiotics months ago. Or having your family ostracised in the community. All because you were affected by leprosy. No one should go through such stigma or discrimination at any point in their lives, especially a vulnerable one.

Health-related stigma continues to be a major cause of discrimination and exclusion. Fear of stigma deters people from seeking healthcare when they may be affected by leprosy, adding to the risk of disability and ongoing medical issues.

On World Leprosy Day, Sunday 26 January 2020, ILEP and its Members call for States to use the UN Principles and Guidelines for the elimination of discrimination against persons affected by leprosy and their family members, which were adopted by the Human Rights Council in 2010. They broadly mirror the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), and provide a valuable roadmap for countries seeking to reduce discrimination and promote the human rights of persons affected by leprosy. By working together, we can achieve zero discrimination for people affected by leprosy and be one step closer to a world with zero discrimination and stigma.

The word leprosy has come to mean more than a curable illness – it is used as a cudgel to exclude, shame and harm people suffering from a disease. Politicians still use it as a symbolfor everything that should be kept apart. And the use of this metaphor has led to massive human rights violations of persons affected by leprosy and their family members. As a result, individuals and families experience social isolation. This affects people‘s self-esteem, disrupts their family relationships and limits their ability to socialise, obtain housing and jobs – their human rights.

On World Leprosy Day, ILEP and its Members provide an important opportunity to draw attention to the often-neglected aspects of this disease – the deep-rooted myths and misconceptions about the disease that many persons affected experience daily. And showcase which articles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are being violated.

Each year about 210,000 women, men and children are diagnosed with leprosy, according to World Health Organization figures. Up to 50% of people affected by leprosy will face mental health issues, such as depression or anxiety. There is also an increased risk of suicide among people living with the disease.

Stigma still frames many discriminatory laws in place, in many different jurisdictions, against persons affected by leprosy. ILEP research from 2019 has revealed that 132 laws discriminating against people affected by leprosy exist in 23 countries. Other ways that stigma is being perpetuated is through social exclusion, a lack of community participation of persons affected, and no or little access to services (economic and social) and rehabilitation. States must abolish these laws and instead promote legislation that ensures human rights and a life of dignity for people affected by leprosy.

ILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Mexico

This submission to the 12th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee recommended inclusions on human rights and leprosy in the List of Issues for Mexico.

ILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Venezuela

This submission to the 12th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee recommended inclusions on human rights and leprosy in the List of Issues for Venezuela.

ILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in India

This submission to the India country briefing at the 22nd CRPD session recommended, among other actions, immediate steps to repeal or amend the 108 discriminatory acts in force in India and to pass the proposed Elimination of Discrimination against Persons affected by Leprosy (EDPAL) legislation.

ILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Lao PDR

This submission to the 12th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee recommended inclusions on human rights and leprosy in the List of Issues for Lao PDR.

ILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Singapore

This submission to the 12th Pre-session of the CRPD Committee recommended repeal or amendment of four discriminatory laws in the List of Issues for Singapore.

Reduce Stigma and Improve Mental Wellbeing in NTDs

Guides on Health-Related Stigma and Mental Wellbeing

Health and social welfare departments, non-governmental organisations and other agencies need help to better understand what stigma is and what can be done to reduce its impact.

Responding to this need, ILEP and the Neglected Tropical Disease NGO Network (NNN) will shortly launch Guides on Health-Related Stigma and Mental Wellbeing.

Read more about the Guides here.

ILEP submission on ending discrimination against persons affected by leprosy in Myanmar

This submission to the Myanmar country briefing at the 22nd CRPD session recommended a set of actions to improve the human rights situation of persons affected by leprosy in Myanmar.

ILEP statement on key themes on human rights and leprosy to opening CRPD Committee session

This statement was delivered during the NGO briefings to the opening session of the 22nd CRPD Committee. It introduces the main themes included in the country-specific ILEP submissions to the 22nd session and the 12th pre-session.

Join us on June 27 for Leprosy, dehumanisation and extreme vulnerability at the Palais des Nations

How to fulfil the 2030 Agenda for stigmatised social groups

Geneva, 18 June 2019 – What is known about leprosy as a condition, from a scientific or biomedical perspective, does not address how people affected by the disease are dehumanised – day after day, in countries around the world – through their lived experience.

“…The label of leprosy has been associated with the abuse and violation of countless women, men and children. And that is true whether these people had visible impairments or not. So, the barriers, the exclusion, the dehumanising attitudes of society, are not just about visible impairments or even about a disease…: they are in the label and in this long, long history of discrimination at all levels.” Geoff Warne, Chief Executive Officer, International Federation of Anti-Leprosy Associations (ILEP).

Each year more than 210,000 women, men and children are diagnosed with leprosy. Up to 50% of people affected by leprosy will experience depression or anxiety due to ongoing stigmatisation on the grounds of their disease. Discrimination and dehumanisation also increase the risk of suicide among people living with leprosy.

Stigma still frames many discriminatory laws in place, in many different jurisdictions, against persons affected by leprosy. ILEP research has revealed that 145 laws discriminating against people affected by leprosy exist in 29 countries. Other ways that stigma is being perpetuated is through social exclusion, a lack of community participation of persons affected, and no or little access to services (economic and social) and rehabilitation.

“I would say that we’re witnessing another turning point in the modern history of leprosy now, with the growing consensus that a human rights agenda is critical for tackling leprosy and leprosy-related discrimination,” said Alice Cruz, UN Special Rapporteur on the elimination of discrimination against persons affected by leprosy and their family members. “However, we have a lot of hard work ahead to raise awareness about leprosy as a human rights issue in the global human rights community and the leprosy community itself. Both still see leprosy as a health issue and that is why we need to foster participation and give voice to persons affected as the first step towards a human rights approach.”

To really understand how stigma is dehumanising to people affected by leprosy, the Permanent Missions of Japan, Brazil, Ecuador, the Republic of Fiji, India and Portugal, ILEP, and the Sasakawa Health Foundation invite you on June 27, 2019, to the Palais des Nations at a side even to the 41stHuman Rights Council to learn about the lived experience of stigma, discrimination and dehumanisation of persons affected by leprosy and their families. It will explore practical ways to ensure that no one is left behind in efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

“Since I have experienced the pain and effects of being affected by leprosy, like difficulties in getting correct treatment, facing stigma, it is easier to understand the thinking and emotional disturbances of these people,” said Rachna Kumari, a Community Mobiliser in a LEPRA Society’s leprosy referral centre in Munger, Bihar State, India, and a member of the ILEP Panel of Men and Women Affected by Leprosy.

Bringing attention to the experiences of people affected by leprosy, and showing how their participation – working with civil society, NGOs, specialised agencies, regional human rights mechanisms, national human rights institutions and the overall United Nations system – is moving the world forward, will be the only way to achieve zero discrimination and will help to bring us one step closer to a world with zero leprosy.

About Alice Cruz

Alice Cruz is the UN Special Rapporteur on the elimination of discrimination against persons affected by leprosy and their family members. The Human Rights Council appointed her to lead the mandate on 1 November 2017. Before that Alice worked as External Professor at the Law School of University Andina Simón Bolívar, Ecuador. She has worked with the Brazilian non-profit organisation Movement for the Reintegration of Persons Affected by Hansen disease (MORHAN) and has served as a member of the International Leprosy Association’s Council (2014-2016). Alice has researched and written on the subject of eliminating leprosy and the stigma attached to it since the beginning of her career.

About ILEP

ILEP is a membership organisation of 13 international NGOs whose outreach spans 69 countries and 710 project locations worldwide. ILEP is supported by two advisory boards; a Panel of Women and Men Affected by Leprosy and the ILEP Technical Commission. In the fight against leprosy, ILEP and its Members work alongside the World Health Organization, Novartis, The Nippon Foundation, other NGOs, governments, Ministries of Health and more than 500,000 supporters worldwide.

About Sasakawa Health Foundation

SHF looks at leprosy as a complex of medical and social/human aspects. SHF believes that a world without leprosy, free from stigma and discrimination, cannot be achieved unless the individuals cured of leprosy enjoy equal and full opportunities as constructive members of the community. SHF supports projects to make them economically and socially independent and empowers them through better education and networking. Since 2003, a representative of people affected by Hansen’s disease has been a member of the SHF Council.

ILEP Annual Report 2018

ILEP’s Annual Report covers our activities in 2018. We are proud to share this report with you as we continue to work collaboratively towards #zerotransmission, #zerodisabilities and #zerodiscrimination. Read the full report here.

Innovation – A big part of the solution

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN) have said that disease prevention and treatment will help to reduce poverty and economic disparity. According to Dr Paul Saunderson, the Medical Director at American Leprosy Missions and chair of ILEP’s Technical Commission, understanding the small details could make all of the difference to the way leprosy is seen and treated.

“One thing I’ve noticed is that there are a lot of small things that are misunderstood about leprosy,” said Dr Saunderson. “Many other neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), are quite common where they occur, so there may be a lot of knowledge around them, such as the broad data in a country, etc. But if you are trying to map leprosy which is generally quite rare, you are doing so along with everything from trachoma, Buruli ulcer, cutaneous leishmaniasis to scabies, yaws or even tuberculosis. There is now an interest in case detection and management as a group, which could allow for better tracking of leprosy cases.”

Many NTD surveys do not need intensive individual data and can estimate numbers in a community, based on sample surveys. This is not the case with leprosy, as the cases are not evenly spread through the community but occur in clusters. In 2009, M.I. Bakker, et al. concluded that a geographical information system (GIS) was necessary to research, manage, have public health focussed interventions, plan and monitor control programmes, and have effective advocacy programmes at the national or sub-national level.

Dr Saunderson emphasised that surveying for leprosy can be time intensive and expensive: “We map based on the patients that we know, and these patients tend to be clustered and unevenly distributed. Historically, the data has been inaccurate for a number of reasons including the fact that it is one of the world’s most stigmatised diseases. Because of their disabilities, people who are affected by leprosy can be shunned, discriminated against and denied their human rights. This stigma affects their physical, psychological, social, and economic security. It is often the financial burden that hurts the most and so the affected who are treated early enough may never admit to having had leprosy.

Regardless of the cost or the reality that getting accurate numbers would be difficult, donors rely on data and mapping to support their health programme funding. But the quality and the scope of the data can be less than ideal, as leprosy can be hidden and sporadically found in a community.

“We have to present our data in different ways,” said Dr Saunderson. If an NGO has people affected by leprosy involved, then alongside whatever data they have they can present a series of anecdotes or experiences. “This would not show the range that better data would, so wouldn’t be perfect from the start, but some organisations are ready to start with something, showing some way of measuring progress.”

When talking about data gathering and organisations that do so, Dr Saunderson said that data was gathered and managed in different ways. This means that you may not be able to compare numbers gathered by one organisation to another. These same organisations often also deal with other diseases, so leprosy gets dropped off the radar because it is paired with a bigger problem. Money from donors for NTDs (or other diseases that leprosy is paired with) is not secure, so the money for one can be at the expense of the other, and that is something that Dr Saunderson would like to avoid.

And because leprosy tends to fall off the radar, Dr Saunderson worries that the top endemic countries won’t ever make a concerted effort to make it a focussed part of the health agenda.

The local health agenda, according to the WHO, should include health system strengthening and improving services at the local level. Though not considered particularly innovative, better services would bring more attention to leprosy case detection.

What is innovative, according to Dr Saunderson, is the ongoing clinical trials of LepVax, the world’s first leprosy-specific vaccine. Dr Saunderson hopes to see clinical trials in Brazil and India by 2020 but they will likely take five or six years. Over the next 10 years he hopes that the vaccine will be widely deployed. Along with the vaccine, Dr Saunderson noted that post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has had very positive results at minimising transmission by reducing the number of new cases. By having both accessible, there would be a longer term advantage.

“Innovation is only a part of the solution,” said Dr Saunderson. “But it could be a very big part.”

ILEP briefing on leprosy to CRPD Committee side event

This is the first formal briefing on leprosy by ILEP to the CRPD Committee. It was delivered to a lunchtime briefing session on leprosy in April 2019. It introduces leprosy as a human rights issue and urges the Committee to include leprosy in the scope of the CRPD Convention.

Submission on ending discrimination against women affected by leprosy in Ethiopia

ILEP supported this submission by one of its Member associations to the 72nd session of the CEDAW Committee covering government actions to improve the human rights situation of women affected by leprosy in Ethiopia.

World Leprosy Day 2019: Time to end the stigma and discrimination of leprosy!

ILEP President’s Statement by Jan van Berkel

This World Leprosy Day, Sunday 27 January, provides an important opportunity to draw attention to the often-neglected aspects of leprosy – the negative social implications many persons affected by the disease experience on a daily basis.

Ending the stigma, discrimination and prejudice of leprosyis the theme of World Leprosy Day 2019.

Each year more than 200,000 women, men and children are diagnosed with leprosy, according to World Health Organisation figures. Approximately 8 out of 10 cases are from India, Brazil or Indonesia.

The majority of people diagnosed with leprosy are known to experience negative social attitudes. These can have devastating consequences on the lives of persons affected by the disease and their family members, and impact upon schooling, work, and marriage. A leprosy diagnosis also affects many people’s mental health and wellbeing.

Up to 50% of people affected by leprosy will face mental health issues, such as depression or anxiety. There is also an increased risk of suicide among people living with the disease.

Stigma towards people affected by leprosy is particularly damaging to women and girls, who may already be more socially vulnerable because of their gender. Girls’ marriage prospects are often dramatically reduced if they are diagnosed with leprosy. Women are more likely to be divorced by their husbands because of the disease and will have a lower chance of remarriage.

ILEP research conducted in 2018 revealed that 157 laws discriminating against people affected by leprosy still exist in 29 countries. States must abolish these laws and instead promote legislation that ensures human rights and a life of dignity for people affected by leprosy.

Other ways we can end stigma and discrimination is through increasing social inclusion, strengthening the community participation of persons affected, improving their access to services (economic and social), and supporting community-based rehabilitation.

On this World Leprosy Day, ILEP calls for States to use the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) as a framework to eliminate the stigma and discrimination used against people with leprosy-related disabilities. States must also implement the UN Principles and Guidelines for the Elimination of Discrimination against Persons Affected by Leprosy and their Family Members, with a focus on more vulnerable groups, such as women and children.

By working together, we can achieve zero discrimination for people affected by leprosy and be one step closer to a world with zero leprosy.


ILEP President, Jan van Berkel

Mohan’s story: overcoming stigma and despair, and helping others to do the same

Born in 1982, Mohan was afflicted with lameness from polio at the age of 2. After his diagnosis of leprosy, however, what slowed him down were not his physical difficulties, but the discrimination he faced from family, relatives, friends, and society. Worried about his future, he hid his disease from his loved ones for a long time. After a time of struggle and difficulty, Mohan has turned his life around and now volunteers with the CREATE Project, run by the Leprosy Mission Trust of India. Today, Mohan travels as an advocate for zero discrimination and dedicates his life to helping improve the mental wellbeing of persons affected by leprosy.

Here is Mohan’s story, in his own words:

“I was affected by leprosy when I was 21… At that particular time no one understood my pain and consoled me. So I decided to hide my disease from my family, society and close ones.

“I experienced too many difficulties from leprosy when it became visible. I had forgotten about my polio disability when I was affected by leprosy; leprosy gives pain psychologically, bigger than physically and socially. I was disgusted to look at my hands. When my deformity was visible, I had the most fearful and painful leprosy stigma from my house, relatives houses, tea shops, hospitals, barber shops, markets, hotels, work places, operation rooms in government hospitals and while travelling also. I lost all my fine arts due to my disease… I did not know that leprosy was curable.

“So many times I tried living with dignity but I failed and tried to kill myself by attempting suicide. Once I was in a forest, and saw a big snake near me; I hoped it might bite me and kill me. I tried to catch it, but it ran away without biting. From that day I hate snakes, because it behaved just like the human beings who discriminated me. I attempted suicide a few more times, but felt sympathy on myself because I wasn’t able to go through with it. Since then, the world had begun to appear to me as two different worlds within it: one world which had normal people and another which had people like me. At that point, I realized that my leprosy could break down the relationship between friends, mother and children, wife and husband, brother and sister, even God and Human. Even my only sister does not allow my nieces and nephews to talk to me, nor am I allowed to touch them.

“At that time I read an article about a village where four men had molested a girl and were caught by the police. In a public debate regarding their punishment, some people answered by saying they should be beheaded, hanged to death or struck with stones. But one person answered that we should use them in medical research, particularly in drug testing, instead of small animals. Suddenly I got an idea and searched over internet for research centre and found the address of one and went. I asked the doctors to use me for any drug testing of leprosy because I had already decided to kill myself. The doctor replied that there is no need for that, because leprosy was curable. He also told me that I can live like others who are living in leprosy colonies and leprosy rehabilitation centers.

“I was convinced that the problems in my life would not change. I was discriminated against yesterday, I was discriminated against today; I will be discriminated against tomorrow and for the rest of my life.

“After a leg surgery at the government hospital, where even nurses, doctors, and other medical professionals discriminated against me, I was admitted in a rehabilitation centre. The home was suitable for old persons who are homeless and hopeless, where I was feeling similarly, until I saw an admission form from the leprosy mission. I asked them to give me a chance to join in The Leprosy Mission Trust of India’s Vocational Training Centre in Vadathorasalur, Tamil Nadu to learn computer and they accepted. The Centre gave me good food, comfortable accommodation; life skill classes for mental development, and taught me self-care for my health as well. Mr. Tinson Thomas, the Principal of that centre, took special care of me professionally and personally.

“One day,he saw me and said encouragingly ‘Mohan you are an intelligent man; so you should have good future and the leprosy mission will always be there with you.’ He was one of first people who hoped that I live a happy life like everyone else.

“After that I attended a training on a stigma toolkit, conducted by CREATE Project of The Leprosy Mission. It allowed me dignity, courage, and confidence in my right to live in society just as much as someone without leprosy. As one of the trainers have said, “Leprosy is not from the past sin or curse of God; do not see them as untouchable because it does not spread from one another.” For the first time, I was happy to express my feelings, share my story, and engage with others. After finishing my computer course, luckily, I got an opportunity to join as a volunteer in CREATE Project.

“If the Leprosy Mission didn’t exist, I would surely have become a beggar or anti-social being. My family was cheated by me because the disease and the stigma collapsed all the future plans, efforts and hopes. The Leprosy Mission made me understand that I am a unique person and have no need to compare with any others.

“People are always asking me, “what is your goal?” Well, I reply that I want to be a role model to the people affected by leprosy, and a contributing member to the community. I never forget the help of CREATE Project, and I will fight against the discrimination until my last breath.”

Maksuda’s Story: A model of leadership and giving back to others with leprosy

Maksuda first met Lepra staff when she was diagnosed with leprosy and received treatment at a local clinic at Sirajganj, Bangladesh. At the time of her diagnosis, she was married; however, she returned to her father’s home with her daughter upon her divorce with her husband. Although Maksuda had successfully been treated for leprosy at this time, she was without her own home or source of income. She returned to Lepra’s Sirajganj office to share her story, as well as ask how she could help.

Maksuda soon signed on as a community volunteer with Lepra, helping to raise awareness of leprosy, its symptoms and how treatment could be accessed. She was also trained to recognise the symptoms of leprosy, which allowed her to examine and refer possible patients to proper treatment.

Lepra also loaned a sewing machine to Maksuda, for which she received training and developed a personal sewing business: her first source of income. Grateful for this opportunity, Maksuda also had a dream of her own: to own a poultry farm. With the encouragement from her peers, financial help of her mother, and earnings from her tailoring business, Maksuda started her poultry farm with 300 chicks.

Gradually, Maksuda expanded her business by applying for a local loan. She also completed a training course for owning and caring for livestock, which was provided by the district Government Youth Development Department in Sirajganj. This allowed her to grow her farm to 2000 chicks.

Despite the successful growth of her dream business, Maksuda wanted to do something to help other people who were living with leprosy or other diseases. With the help of the Lepra staff in Bangladesh, she was able to form a self-help group called Kalyani Pratibondhi Unyaon Dal. Serving as treasurer, she now provides each group member with 19000 taka to allow them to develop a livelihood and support their own families, as she was able to do with the help of Lepra. Maksuda sources this money to her group through her personal savings, as well as donations and income from the group businesses.

Maksuda also became a member of the Self Care Practice Group in Lepra’s “Reaching the Unreached” Project, where she practices self-care techniques with other members to care for the areas of the body affected by leprosy, and clean any injuries to prevent infection.

Maksuda’s poultry farm continues to prosper, and with the encouragement of Lepra staff, she has expanded her farm to a size of 3000 sonaly chickens. She has also added goats and cows into the mix. She has worked enough to earn approximately 25000 taka each month, which is enough to support her family, and send her only daughter to study a diploma in physiotherapy at a private institution.

Maksuda dreams that her daughter “will be a physiotherapist and serve the poor.”

Maksuda continues to conduct community health awareness campaigns for Lepra, examining and referring suspected cases of leprosy, and teaching self-care to people affected by leprosy and Limb Swelling Disease (Lymphatic Filariasis). She also regularly speaks to people in her community about the problems that she encountered, such as divorce, abuse and living with leprosy, and helps to support people going through similar situations.

’’I want people to know that Leprosy is curable and we can defeat it by building awareness on leprosy and its consequences through forming unity in the community.’’

Ajay’s story: Leprosy’s impact on families

Meet Ajay, aged 40, from Amroha, India. This is his story, told in his own words, to help raise awareness of stigma and discrimination this World Leprosy Day.

“When I was only fifteen years old, leprosy changed my life. I discovered a strange spot on my skin. I thought it would disappear with time. But it only got worse. Then I also lost the feeling in my hands and feet. My family and the other villagers kept me at a distance. They would keep staring at my deformed hands and feet. They were afraid they would become affected with leprosy as well. My mother was the only one who didn’t mind touching me and caring for me.

But then, suddenly, my mother died. I didn’t know what to do without her. Everyone else loathed my presence; there was not a soul willing to help me. I felt so helpless and lonely that I decided to leave my village. Afraid of all that I had to face.

It was only then that I went to see a doctor. He told me I had leprosy. He gave me medicines and treated the many wounds and ulcers I had contracted. ‘You will find a leprosy colony in Amroha’, he told me. ‘You can live there.’ And so I did. Where else could I go?

My wife, son, and I live an isolated life here, together with about thirty other families. I barely have the money to provide for my family. Every day I try to get a few rupees begging. I don’t have a choice. Nobody wants to employ me because of my deformities. My greatest worry is the future of my thirteen-year-old son Shivkumar. He doesn’t have leprosy, but he’s discriminated all the same. There is a chance he’ll never get married. People don’t want the child of a person affected by leprosy. They simply won’t accept a marriage like that.

It’s my dream that my son will never be forced to beg, and will be able to build a better life outside the leprosy colony. I don’t want him to go through the same misery I have gone through. He should not become the victim of my leprosy. I want him to pursue an education, as it gives him a better outlook for the future, but sadly that’s out of my hands.”

ILEP member, the Netherlands Leprosy Relief (NLR), report that Ajay has now received training in self-care and his son Shivkumar will undergo vocational training.

Click here for a short video from NLR about Ajay.

Neru’s Story: Losing out on childhood and schooling

Neru was only eight when she discovered she had leprosy. Her mother had noticed patches on Neru’s body and Neru also complained of numbness in her right hand and right leg. As time went on this numbness worsened and her hand began to stiffen and she could no longer open or close her hand, or hold things easily. Her mother took her to a government hospital where she was diagnosed with an aggressive form of leprosy and started on a multi-drug therapy. Neru did not realise how serious the diagnosis was and what impact it could have. “The doctor told me that I had leprosy, I did not feel anything but I could see my mother was very sad” she says.

Although Neru was started on a year’s course of the drugs, the prejudice and discrimination she faced showed that a physical cure was not all that she would need.

“I went to school the next day and the dinner lady, just as I approached her with a plate for food, shouted at me and told me that ‘you don’t need to come to school anymore’. After that me and the other students affected by leprosy ran from the school to home. I felt so sad about it and I cried a lot. I decided not to go school again and stopped my studies.”

This stigmatization of Neru extended to her family and her life outside of her education. “We were taking water from the hand pump near school,” she says, “People did not allow us to take water from that hand pump and were telling us that we may spread leprosy to other village people. We decided to go further away to get drinking water.”

After such treatment, it was hard for Neru not to absorb this feeling of shame: “I also felt that I have very serious disease which may spread to my family members so I just kept my distance from them and I was hiding my hand when people came to my home. I was frightened about the people in our village, I could not go anywhere to play.”

Although she had completed the year’s course of the multi-drug therapy, leprosy had caused Neru to lose out on her childhood; it had prevented her from being a part of a community and meant that for more than two years, she stopped her education.

As part of Lepra’s outreach, they give talks to communities, and one day they visited Neru’s village. They were able to explain to her mother how they could help her daughter with reconstructive surgery, and how they would be able to provide the funding, as well as pre- and post-operative physiotherapy. The surgery, along with the physiotherapy would mean Neru would have to stay in the hospital for 45 days. But with this treatment, she would regain full use of her arm and leg.

In the late spring of 2017, Neru had reconstructive surgery at the St Joseph Leprosy Centre in Madhya Pradesh. By this point, she had also developed a partial foot drop on her right leg, which meant she could no longer lift her foot at the ankle. She had a course of physiotherapy and we also gave her customised protective footwear to strengthen her ankle muscles. With our help, and through determination and family support, Neru was able to make a recovery. She could walk more easily and use her hand again.

She began to regain some of the confidence that she used to have. At the centre, she made friends and found new support from the people she met during her treatment. She also started to study once more and, as her community had heard our health awareness talks, they no longer feared the disease so she was able to use the village water pump again. However, Neru was still frightened to go back to school, worried of how she would be treated there.

Because Lepra recognizes the broad and damaging affects leprosy can have, they don’t just supply medical treatment, but emotional and practical support to individuals and family’s living with the disease. They visited the school and told the teachers her story and they were happy to allow her back, even after almost a three-year gap.

She even met the dinner lady who had turned her away: the woman took her hand, looked at it, and said how glad she was to see it healed. She said that she would look to see if any other child was showing symptoms of leprosy and refer them to the government hospital.

 At first Neru’s diagnosis seemed like an end to her childhood, her education and her place in the community. Now she has returned to school and what is more wants to become a teacher herself:

“I want to become teacher in our village and I will teach all the students very well,” she says.

World Leprosy Day: Up to half of leprosy affected people face mental health issues

ILEP releases interactive report on leprosy and stigma ahead of World Leprosy Day

ILEP is shining a light on the invisible scars of stigma ahead of this year’s World Leprosy Day–themed around ending the stigma and discrimination associated with leprosy–with the publication of a new interactive report.

The report reveals that up to 50% of people affected by leprosy will face mental health issues, such as depression or anxiety. (1) Depression is the most common mental health condition among persons affected by leprosy. There is also an increased risk of suicide among people living with the disease. (2)

Zero discrimination: ending the stigma of leprosy sets out the links between leprosy, negative social attitudes, gender inequality, myths, legal discrimination and mental health issues. The report argues that if we are to achieve zero leprosy, we must end the stigma and the laws and practices that discriminate against people affected by leprosy and their families.

The voices of women, men and children affected by leprosy are heard throughout the report. Rachna Kumari, member of the panel of women and men affected at the International Federation of Anti-Leprosy Associations (ILEP), and Community Mobilizer in the LEPRA Society in India, describes her experience:

“In India, humiliation and prejudice related to leprosy are very harsh, even more to a woman. My parents-in-law kicked me out of the house. My parents spent all their money supporting me and taking care of my children while I looked for medical assistance… Being affected by leprosy, especially if you are poor, is a heavy burden. There is no hope in the childhood and future of affected girls. Violence against women is threefold: gender, stigma and disabilities. It causes suicidal thoughts in women.”

Every year, more than 200,000 persons are diagnosed with leprosy worldwide. While the disease is easily curable if detected early, around 6 million treated people affected by leprosy experience life-long disabilities or discrimination, or both.

Many live in some of the world’s poorest and most marginalized communities. Individuals affected by leprosy often experience rejection, shame and social exclusion from work or school.

These negative attitudes can also create a barrier to treatment, hindering efforts to stop the disease transmission at a global scale. Stigma, prejudice, and discrimination can prevent people with the symptoms of leprosy from seeking and accessing medical help, which delays diagnosis and treatment.

ILEP CEO Geoff Warne says: “We understand that achieving zero leprosy is not solely a medical issue. We need to change the way the disease is perceived and talked about within societies. This is no small task. But it is heartening to see the success of NGOs and organisations of people affected by leprosy who are demanding that the human rights of affected persons are upheld.

“I believe that this report, and World Leprosy Day later this month, will help to break down barriers, raise awareness and support the efforts of those fighting for social inclusion and mental wellbeing for everyone affected by leprosy.”

Ends

Notes to Editors

[1]Lepra publication “Building the case for the integration of Mental Health services in leprosy and lymphatic filariasis programmes” 2018 https://www.infontd.org/resource/building-case-integration-mental-health-services-leprosy-and-lymphatic-filariasis?aresult=0

[2]Gurvinder Pal Singh, Psychosocial aspects of Hansen’s Disease, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3505422/

Read the report in English

Read the report in French

Valdenora’s Story: Amazonian trailblazer fighting for equality

Ahead of World Leprosy Day 2019, we meet inspiring people fighting against the stigma and discrimination associated with leprosy. From Brazil, this is Valdenora’s remarkable story of survival, recovery and advocacy.

Valdenora da Cruz Rodrigues was born on May 24, 1960 in the town of Arauiri, in the municipality of Tefé, Amazonas. Fifteen days after her birth, her biological mother died of Tuberculosis. After her mother’s death, Valdenora was delivered by her father to the couple who had baptized her. According to her adoptive parents, she was a very sick child, compromised by the lack of nutritional breastfeeding. When her adoptive mother was pregnant with her first child, Valdenora was taken care of by an uncle who had leprosy. At the age of 8, the first signs of her leprosy began to appear: spots, pains in the body, and edema in the hands, feet and ears.

At this time, it was common for people from the interior of the country and from the riverside communities to seek help through medicinal plants, healers and spiritual support. Her relatives used this type of treatment, but they were not successful. Children at the school where Valdenora studied, and where her adoptive mother was a teacher, began to isolate her when they noticed her signs of leprosy. Then, some parents pulled their children out of school. Because this was the only school in the community, Valdenora’s mother soon lost her job as a result of her daughter’s leprosy.

One day Valdenora’s parents took her to a doctor in the city of Tefé, which was 4 hours away by boat (they had no motor boat). After four visits to the city, she was diagnosed with leprosy in 1969 and the doctors ordered her hospitalization in the Antonio Aleixo Colony in Manaus. Her family mobilized to get her sandals (she had never worn any footwear) and clothes (because her clothes were made of sugar-bag fabric) so she could travel to the capital.

When her father took her to board the boat at Canoa, she was not allowed to travel with the other passengers, as they feared her leprosy. She was instead placed in a canoe, tied in tow to the boat. To protect her from the sun and the rain, her father wove a cover for the canoe.

The voyage to Manaus, where she would be hospitalized in the colony, took two long days and nights, during which the 9 year old Valdenora was unable to feed. She recalls being scared, alone and in tears. The years in the colony were very difficult, because as a child she did not understand why she was hospitalized and isolated from her family. In 1976, at age 16, she was discharged from the hospital and returned to her community; however, after a year she returned to the colony, after feeling stigmatized by the people of the community who treated her as the sick girl who returned. In 1978, the colony was decommissioned due to the ordinance that ended segregation for people affected by leprosy. In 1981, aged 21, she was hired by the Health Department of the State of Amazonas as a nursing assistant, then learned to be a midwife – a common traditional role for women in the community.  However, before being hired by the state as a midwife, she suffered prejudice in the company where she worked, for having been a resident of the colony hospital.

In that same year, she started living with Mr. Edigilson Barroncas, her companion until today. In that same year, along with other comrades she became involved in the social movement and in 1982 they founded MORHAN in Manaus – a Brazilian NGO for the rights of people affected by leprosy. On International Women’s Day in 1984 she was honoured by the Municipal Chamber of São Bernardo do Campo in the State of São Paulo.

In 1985, she was affected by a recurrence of leprosy, accompanied by a reaction. The development of a claw in her hands and feet caused her to experience revolt, indignation and disappointment, because at the age of 26 she was now prevented her from doing what she liked best: delivering children.

After much struggle, she was one of the first people in her state to achieve disability retirement after being affected by leprosy. In 1994, she and her partner adopted their only son. Adopting her son was one of her greatest difficulties in coping with stigma, because her son suffered a lot of prejudice as the child of people affected by leprosy. This hurt Valdenora and upset her a lot. Both she and her husband were prevented from attending parent-teacher meetings in the schools where their son studied.

Today, Valdenora’s son continues to help his parents advocate for the rights of people affected by leprosy. In 1999, she was elected to the State Health Council of Amazonas. In 2005, she was elected to MORHAN’s national board of directors and in 2006, she became a Board Member of the National Council for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

At 58, Valdenora is still a fighter for the rights of people affected by leprosy, women and people with disabilities in Brazil. She is a remarkable person for her commitment, strength and all that she has overcome.

Story provided by MORHAN.